The Attention Crisis: Deconstructing Digital Addiction and Architecting a Humane Technological Future
Abstract
The digital revolution has reshaped society, yet its promise of enhanced productivity and connection is increasingly overshadowed by a public health crisis of digital addiction. This paper examines the architecture of the "attention economy," a business model predicated on maximizing user engagement for profit, which has led to the widespread use of psychologically manipulative design in technology. We analyze the profound consequences of this model, including a documented decline in mental and physical health, impaired cognitive and socio-emotional development in children, and the erosion of critical thinking through cognitive offloading. Supported by current data and global statistics, this paper provides a multi-stakeholder analysis, outlining the roles and responsibilities of the tech industry, venture capital, governments, educators, and parents in both perpetuating and potentially solving this crisis. We present a roadmap for a more humane technological future, detailing principles of ethical design, viable alternative business models, and proactive regulatory frameworks. The paper concludes by looking toward the next frontier of neurotechnology, such as Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs), arguing that the lessons from the current crisis necessitate a fundamental shift toward proactive, coordinated, and humane stewardship of technology to ensure it serves human well-being rather than undermining it.
Part I: The Problem - Anatomy of the Attention Economy
The challenges of the modern digital ecosystem—from declining mental health to societal polarization—are not accidental. They are the consequences of an economic system that has commodified human attention. This section deconstructs the foundational principles of the attention economy, demonstrating that digital addiction is not a failure of individual willpower but a triumph of a business model meticulously designed to capture and monetize human consciousness (Harris, 2016; Orlowski, 2020).
1.1 The Economics of Human Attention
The concept of an "attention economy" was first theorized by Nobel laureate Herbert A. Simon, who in 1971 observed that a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention (United Nations Economist Network, 2023; Wikipedia, n.d.-a). The internet actualized this theory on a global scale. As information became infinitely abundant and effectively free, its economic value plummeted, while the value of the scarce resource needed to consume it—human attention—skyrocketed (United Nations Economist Network, 2023).
This inversion gave rise to a dominant business model where user engagement is the primary commodity. Platforms offer "free" services in exchange for users' time and data (Bernstein, 2025; Orlowski, 2020). The more time a user spends on a platform, the more data can be collected. This data is then used to build detailed profiles sold to advertisers for precision targeting, making the user the product, not the customer (Orlowski, 2020). This creates a fundamental misalignment: the platform's financial success, measured in metrics like "time on device," is directly tied to maximizing user screen time, an outcome often detrimental to user well-being (Bernstein, 2025; Bhargava & Velasquez, 2021).
1.2 The Psychology and Technology of Addictive Design
To maximize engagement, tech companies employ sophisticated behavioral design, engineering products to be habit-forming (Eyal, n.d.-a; Schulson, 2019). A key framework is the "Hook Model," a four-stage loop: trigger, action, variable reward, and investment (Eyal, n.d.-a).
Trigger: A cue, such as a push notification (external) or a feeling of boredom (internal), prompts the user to engage (Eyal, n.d.-a; Harris, 2016).
Action: The simplest behavior done in anticipation of a reward, like scrolling a feed (Eyal, n.d.-a).
Variable Reward: The most crucial stage. The unpredictability of the reward—a compelling post, a "like," or a mundane update—creates a powerful, slot-machine-like compulsion (Harris, 2016; Sketchplanations, 2022; Van der Linden, 2023). This intermittent reinforcement is highly effective at driving repeat behavior and is known to be powerfully addictive (ABTABA, 2023; Sketchplanations, 2022).
Investment: The user puts something into the product (a post, a comment, data), which loads the next trigger and increases their commitment to the platform (Eyal, n.d.-a).
This cycle is amplified by exploiting the brain's dopamine reward system. Social media notifications provide small, pleasurable hits of dopamine, reinforcing the behavior (Addiction Center, n.d.; Ali, 2023; University of California, Davis Health, 2024). This is particularly effective because it targets deep-seated human needs for social validation and the fear of missing out (FOMO) (Ali, 2023; GoAro, 2024; UC Davis Health, 2024).
1.3 The Scale of Digital Dependency: A 2025 Snapshot
The result is a global population deeply enmeshed in digital dependency. As of 2025, approximately 36.7% of the global population is estimated to be addicted to the internet (Virtual Addiction, 2024a).
Part II: The Consequences - The Individual and Societal Cost
The architecture of the attention economy exacts a heavy toll, manifesting as measurable, real-world harm to individuals and the fabric of society.
2.1 The Impact on Mental and Physical Well-being
A strong link exists between heavy social media use and an increased risk for depression, anxiety, loneliness, and self-harm, particularly among youth (Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2024; UC Davis Health, 2024). In 2023, the U.S. Surgeon General issued an advisory highlighting that teens spending over three hours a day on social media face double the risk of poor mental health outcomes (Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2024). Social media’s curated "highlight reels" fuel a culture of social comparison that can erode self-esteem and worsen body image, with 46% of teenage girls reporting that social media makes them feel worse about their bodies (Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2024; UC Davis Health, 2024).
The physical consequences are also significant. Blue light from screens suppresses melatonin, disrupting sleep, and technology addiction is strongly correlated with sleep problems (Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2024; Young Minds Network, 2023). This is compounded by a more sedentary lifestyle, which is linked to health issues like obesity and muscle pain (Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2024; Virtual Addiction, 2024a).
2.2 The Developing Mind: Technology's Impact on Children
The developing brains of children are uniquely vulnerable. Excessive screen time and media multitasking are linked to worse executive functioning, decreased attention spans, and poorer academic outcomes (Al-Zarea & Al-Ausaimi, 2023; Young Minds Network, 2023). One major longitudinal study found that each additional daily hour of TV exposure at age two was associated with a 7% decrease in classroom engagement and a 6% decrease in math proficiency later in school (Al-Zarea & Al-Ausaimi, 2023).
Socio-emotional development is also affected. Digital communication often strips away non-verbal cues (e.g., body language, tone of voice), which are essential for developing empathy and reading social situations (Children and Screens, 2022; Young Minds Network, 2023). Toddlers with higher screen time show a negative association with social skills development, and older children who spend a week at a screen-free camp show significant improvement in their ability to read non-verbal emotional cues (Qustodio, 2023).
2.3 The "Google Effect": Cognitive Offloading and its Societal Implications
A more subtle but profound consequence is "cognitive offloading"—the increasing reliance on external tools like search engines and AI to store information and perform cognitive tasks (Foster, 2023; Ward, 2021). This phenomenon, also known as the "Google Effect," has been shown to diminish our internal memory capabilities; when people expect to have future access to information, they have lower rates of recall of the information itself and enhanced recall for where to access it (Sparrow et al., 2011).
This creates a dependency cycle: the more we offload, the weaker our internal memory becomes, making us more reliant on technology (Foster, 2023; Storm et al., 2021). Perhaps most concerning is the impact on critical thinking. A 2024 study found a significant negative correlation between frequent AI tool usage and critical thinking abilities, an effect mediated by increased cognitive offloading (Hryhorovych et al., 2024; MDPI, 2024). This could lead to a future where individuals are highly efficient at information retrieval but less capable of independent analysis, synthesis, and evaluation (Hryhorovych et al., 2024).
Part III: The Ecosystem - A Multi-Stakeholder Call to Action
Solving the attention crisis requires a coordinated effort from all stakeholders. This section outlines the roles and responsibilities of each group, proposing a shift from assigning blame to fostering shared accountability.
3.1 The Role of the Technology Industry
Tech companies must move beyond a narrow focus on profit and embrace a doctrine of corporate responsibility for user well-being (TechDay, 2024). This is not only a moral imperative but a strategic one; as consumer awareness grows, trust is becoming a key competitive differentiator. A 2023 survey found that 73% of consumers are more likely to buy from a company that values transparency (Bisinfotech, 2024).
Building an ethical culture requires a systemic commitment, from the C-suite down, to embed ethical considerations into the entire product development lifecycle (The Collective, 2023; Deloitte, 2021; Santa Clara University, 2020). This includes:
Leadership Commitment: The CEO and board must champion ethical technology as a core value (Santa Clara University, 2020; The Corporate Governance Institute, n.d.).
Ethics by Design: Proactively anticipating potential harms and designing products to avoid them from the start, rather than treating ethics as a final compliance check (Deloitte, 2021).
Open Dialogue: Creating safe channels for employees to voice ethical concerns without fear of retribution (The Collective, 2023).
3.2 The Role of Venture Capital
The venture capital (VC) industry was the financial engine of the attention economy, rewarding startups that demonstrated rapid user growth, often achieved through addictive design (Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 2020). However, a shift is underway. Responsible investing, which integrates Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors, is now mainstream, with ESG-focused VC funds reaching a record $3.4 billion in assets under management in 2022 (status.asucd.ucdavis.edu, 2024).
This creates an opportunity to redirect capital toward more humane technology.
For Entrepreneurs: Pitches should frame ethical design as a competitive advantage that builds long-term customer trust, mitigates regulatory risk, and attracts top talent (CosmicGold, 2024; Stirling, 2024).
For VCs: Due diligence must expand to include societal impact assessments. VCs should actively fund startups with sustainable, non-attention-based business models and adopt ethical codes of conduct, such as the Mensarius Oath, to establish clear standards for responsible investment (Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 2020; Founder Institute, n.d.).
3.3 The Role of Governance: Regulators and Policymakers
Governments worldwide are beginning to respond to the harms of addictive technology. The European Union has taken a leading role, with its Digital Services Act (DSA) effectively banning "dark patterns" and a 2023 resolution calling for new legislation to prohibit features like infinite scroll and autoplay (European Parliament, 2023; Spanish Data Protection Agency, 2024). In the United States, federal bills like the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and the Social Media Addiction Reduction Technology (SMART) Act have been proposed, while states like New York, Utah, and Florida have advanced their own legislation (Bernstein, 2025; Let's Talk Privacy, 2019; The Regulatory Review, 2024).
These efforts face legal challenges from the tech industry, often on First Amendment grounds (Bernstein, 2025; Schulson, 2019). A central debate has emerged between two regulatory models (Bernstein, 2025):
The Tech Liability Model: Places responsibility on companies to change their products and holds them liable for harms.
The Parent Gatekeeper Model: Requires companies to provide parental controls, shifting the burden to families.
Public health advocates argue that the Tech Liability Model is essential, as placing the onus on parents to manage a system designed for addiction is an unfair and unwinnable fight (Bernstein, 2025). To be effective, policy must be proactive, moving beyond banning specific features toward broader, principle-based frameworks like a "Truth in Technology" Act, which would mandate transparency about design techniques and their foreseeable effects (Ozair, 2025).
3.4 The Role of Society: Parents, Educators, and Individuals
Society is the third critical pillar of the solution.
Parents: The most effective strategy is not simple restriction but positive role-modeling of healthy tech habits (Raising Children Network, 2023; Young Minds Network, 2023). This includes establishing tech-free zones and times (e.g., dinner table, bedrooms), co-creating a family media plan, and focusing on the quality of screen time over the quantity (Circle, n.d.; Raising Children Network, 2023).
Educators: Schools have a responsibility to implement comprehensive K-12 digital literacy and citizenship curricula (Futurelab, 2009; LNESC, n.d.). This must go beyond functional skills to teach critical thinking, source evaluation, and an understanding of the persuasive design and business models that shape online experiences (Futurelab, 2009).
Individuals: Users can reclaim agency by taking concrete steps to curate their digital environment. This includes turning off non-essential notifications, using grayscale mode to make devices less stimulating, and deleting the most problematic apps to reintroduce "friction" into the process of engagement (Harris, 2016; Mastermind Behavior, 2024).
Part IV: The Future - From Crisis to Opportunity
The path forward is not a retreat from technology, but a deliberate effort to reshape it into a tool that serves human values.
4.1 Architecting Humane Technology
The antidote to addictive technology is humane technology. This movement, championed by organizations like the Center for Humane Technology, advocates for a "Time Well Spent" design philosophy (Bagby, 2023; Harris, 2016). The goal shifts from maximizing engagement to helping people live the lives they want to live.
This philosophy is built on core principles:
Empowerment: Putting users in control with clear tools to set limits and manage their data (LogRocket, 2024).
Transparency: Eliminating "dark patterns" and providing clear information about how a product works (Future Processing, 2024; LogRocket, 2024).
Finitude: Designing with natural stopping points, like "You're All Caught Up" messages, to prevent mindless scrolling (LogRocket, 2024).
Respectful Interaction: Minimizing unnecessary interruptions and giving users full control over notifications (LogRocket, 2024).
Inclusivity: Designing for a diverse range of human abilities, perspectives, and cultural backgrounds from the start (Future Processing, 2024).
4.2 The Advantage of Trust: New Business Models
Ethical design is not incompatible with profitability. Viable business models exist that align financial success with user well-being.
Subscription Model: Customers pay a recurring fee, incentivizing the company to deliver continuous, tangible value to earn loyalty and prevent churn (Harvard Business School Online, 2022; Weland et al., 2023).
Freemium Model: A basic version is offered for free, while users pay for an upgraded version with advanced features. This model allows a product to demonstrate its value before asking for payment (Harvard Business School Online, 2022).
The Digital Wellness Market: The growing public demand for healthier technology has created a massive market opportunity. The global digital health market is projected to grow from $347.35 billion in 2025 to $946.04 billion by 2030 (The Research Insights, 2025).
Embracing these models creates a powerful competitive advantage. Ethical companies build deeper customer loyalty, attract and retain mission-driven talent, and reduce future regulatory and reputational risks (Number Analytics, 2024; TechDay, 2024).
4.3 Areas for Caution: The Next Frontier of BCIs
As we address today's challenges, we must anticipate tomorrow's. Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs)—devices that create a direct communication pathway between the brain and a computer—represent the next frontier of ethical challenges (Coin et al., 2020; Papageorgiou et al., 2024). While promising for medical applications, their potential for non-medical use raises unprecedented concerns (Papageorgiou et al., 2024):
Privacy of Thought: As BCIs become more sophisticated, they may be able to infer emotional states or even unexpressed thoughts, blurring the final frontier of privacy (Future of Privacy Forum, 2022; Lai et al., 2023).
Autonomy and Agency: Bidirectional BCIs that can "write" to the brain could influence a user's actions and decisions, challenging fundamental concepts of free will and personal identity (Bitbrain, n.d.-a; Papageorgiou et al., 2024).
Neuromarketing: The ability to directly measure a consumer's neural response to a product would provide a tool for persuasion of unimaginable power, potentially bypassing rational choice entirely (Bitbrain, n.d.-b).
The societal disruption caused by the attention economy was a failure of proactive governance (Jisc, 2024). We cannot afford to repeat this mistake with technologies as profound as BCIs. We must move from a reactive to a proactive model, establishing broad, "evergreen" principles of responsible innovation now, before these technologies become mass-market products (Ozair, 2025).
4.4 Conclusion: The Imperative for Humane Stewardship
Technology is not a deterministic force; its impact is a reflection of the choices we make. The attention crisis illustrates what happens when powerful tools are guided by a narrow and misaligned set of incentives. It has degraded our well-being, undermined our institutions, and diminished our capacity for deep thought and genuine connection.
However, this crisis has also sparked a global conversation about our values and the kind of future we want to build. The solution lies in a new form of collective stewardship. It requires that innovators embrace responsibility, investors prioritize long-term human value, governments regulate proactively, and that we, as a society, cultivate the critical awareness to be masters of our technology, not its servants. Technology was intended to be a tool to enhance human life—to improve productivity, efficiency, and connection. The challenge of our time is to reclaim that original purpose, ensuring that our digital tools are built not at the cost of our health, relationships, and humanity, but in service of them.
References
ABTABA. (2023). Variable-ratio schedule: Definition, examples, and applications. https://www.abtaba.com/blog/variable-ratio-schedule
Addiction Center. (n.d.). Social media addiction. Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://www.addictioncenter.com/behavioral-addictions/social-media-addiction/
Ali, S. (2023). The psychology of social media addiction. Medium. https://medium.com/@sana.ali_91119/the-psychology-of-social-media-addiction-61a0525a3add
allconnect. (2025, June 13). Screen time statistics and facts for 2025. https://www.allconnect.com/blog/screen-time-stats
Al-Zarea, B. K., & Al-Ausaimi, S. M. (2023). The impact of screen media on children’s development. Cureus, 15(6), e40588. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40588
Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2024, December 12). What are the effects of social media on mental health? https://www.aecf.org/blog/effects-of-social-media-on-mental-health
A. T. Kearney. (2025). Screen time for kids statistics : How it’s affecting them. Motherly. https://www.mother.ly/child/child-learn-play/screen-time-for-kids-statistics-2025/
Bagby. (2023, August 3). The "Time Well Spent" Movement: Reclaiming digital well-being and productivity. https://bagby.co/blogs/digital-wellbeing-pills/time-well-spent
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. (2020). Responsible investing in tech and venture capital. Harvard Kennedy School. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/responsible-investing-tech-and-venture-capital
Bernstein, G. (2025). Gatekeeping screen time: Configuring the regulation of addictive technologies and kids' privacy rights. Villanova Law Review, 69(5), 949. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/vlr/vol69/iss5/3
Bhargava, V. R., & Velasquez, M. (2021). Ethics of the attention economy: The problem of social media addiction. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 40(3), 321-357.
Bisinfotech. (2024). Ethical tech: Why consumers now demand transparency. https://www.bisinfotech.com/ethical-tech-why-consumers-now-demand-transparency/
Bitbrain. (n.d.-a). Ethics of neurotechnology and its future. Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://www.bitbrain.com/blog/ethics-neurotechnology-future
Bitbrain. (n.d.-b). Is neuromarketing ethical or unethical? Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://www.bitbrain.com/blog/ethics-neuromarketing
BrandWell. (2024). Social media addiction statistics (2025 report). https://brandwell.ai/blog/social-media-addiction-statistics/
Children and Screens: Institute of Digital Media and Child Development. (2022). How does technology affect kids’ social development? https://www.childrenandscreens.org/learn-explore/research/how-does-technology-affect-kids-social-development/
Circle. (n.d.). How to manage screen time for kids. Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://meetcircle.com/pages/screen-time
Coin, A., Mulder, M., & Dubljević, V. (2020). Ethical aspects of BCI technology: What is the state of the art? Philosophies, 5(4), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies5040031
CosmicGold. (2024). Startups and ethics: A fine line. Medium. https://cosmicgold.medium.com/startups-and-ethics-a-fine-line-97433894057f
Deloitte. (2021). Making ethical technology a priority. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/digital-transformation/make-ethical-technology-a-priority.html
DemandSage. (2025a). Average screen time statistics in 2025 (by age, country). https://www.demandsage.com/screen-time-statistics/
DemandSage. (2025b, June 13). Social media addiction statistics 2025 (the latest data). https://www.demandsage.com/social-media-addiction-statistics/
European Parliament. (2023, December 12). New EU rules needed to address digital addiction. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231208IPR15767/new-eu-rules-needed-to-address-digital-addiction
Eyal, N. (n.d.-a). The Hook Model of behavioral design: A simple summary. World of Work. Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://worldofwork.io/2019/07/hook-model-of-behavioral-design/
Foster, A. (2023, May 17). Offloading information, loading risk: The consequences of cognitive offloading. Medium. https://medium.com/@afoster1_29667/offloading-information-loading-risk-the-consequences-of-cognitive-offloading-60c217b41750
Founder Institute. (n.d.). The Mensarius Oath: An ethical code of conduct for venture capitalists. Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://fi.co/insight/the-mensarius-oath
Future of Privacy Forum. (2022). Brain-computer interfaces: Privacy and ethical considerations for the connected mind. https://fpf.org/blog/brain-computer-interfaces-privacy-and-ethical-considerations-for-the-connected-mind/
Futurelab. (2009). Digital literacy in practice: Case studies of primary and secondary classrooms. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/media/1tgpl0a5/digital_literacy_in_practice_case_studies_of_primary_and_secondary_classrooms.pdf
Future Processing. (2024, September 12). Ethical design principles, benefits, and examples. https://www.future-processing.com/blog/ethical-design-principles-benefits-and-examples/
GoAro. (2024). 6 psychological triggers behind social media addiction. https://www.goaro.com/blog/6-psychological-triggers-behind-social-media-addiction
Harris, T. (2016, May 18). How technology hijacks people’s minds — from a magician and Google’s design ethicist. Thrive Global. https://medium.com/thrive-global/how-technology-hijacks-peoples-minds-from-a-magician-and-google-s-design-ethicist-56d62ef5edf3
Harvard Business School Online. (2022, October 26). 5 examples of tech startup business models. https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/startup-business-models
Hryhorovych, V., Sarsembayeva, L., Kostiuk, S., Tsiuniak, O., & Prokopchuk, L. (2024). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387701784_AI_Tools_in_Society_Impacts_on_Cognitive_Offloading_and_the_Future_of_Critical_Thinking
Jisc. (2024, May 10). Regulating the future: AI and governance. National Centre for AI. https://nationalcentreforai.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2024/05/10/regulating-the-future-ai-and-governance/
Lai, C. S., Gazit, N., Olds, P., Lee, S. W., Hires, S. A., & Carmena, J. M. (2023). Causal evidence for the role of spatial representations in shaping brain-wide dynamics and behavior. Neuron, 111(13), 2113-2127.
Let's Talk Privacy. (2019). Social Media Addiction Reduction Technology (SMART) Act. MIT Media Lab. https://letstalkprivacy.media.mit.edu/bill-smart/
LNESC. (n.d.). Digital education. Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://www.lnesc.org/programs/digitaleducation/
LogRocket. (2024). Humane design: A UX guide to prioritizing user well-being. https://blog.logrocket.com/ux-design/humane-design-ux/
Mastermind Behavior. (2024). Average screen time statistics 2024. https://www.mastermindbehavior.com/post/average-screen-time-statistics
MDPI. (2024). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Journal of Intelligence, 15(1), 6. https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6
Number Analytics. (2024). New ethical startup ideas: Fair paths to success. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/new-ethical-startup-ideas-fair-paths-success
Orlowski, J. (Director). (2020). The social dilemma [Film]. Exposure Labs; Argent Pictures.
Ozair, M. (2025, March 10). Emerging technology regulations: A comprehensive, evergreen approach. Moneytransmitterlaw.com. https://moneytransmitterlaw.com/2025-03-10-emerging-technology-regulations-a-comprehensive-evergreen-approach/
Papageorgiou, E., Koliou, E., Georgiou, K., & Kourouklari, N. (2024). Ethical issues of brain-computer interfaces: A literature review. Bioengineering, 11(5), 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11050499
Qustodio. (2023). How technology affects a child’s social development. https://www.qustodio.com/en/blog/technology-child-social-development/
Raising Children Network. (2023). Parent technology use: For role-modelling healthy habits. https://raisingchildren.net.au/grown-ups/family-life/media-technology/parent-technology-use
Santa Clara University. (2020). 5 steps for making tech ethics work for your company. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/all-about-ethics/5-steps-for-making-tech-ethics-work-for-your-company/
Schulson, M. (2019). The law and the loop: The regulation of habit-forming technology. Fordham Law Review, 88(1), 213-248. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5619&context=flr
Sketchplanations. (2022, November 27). Variable rewards. https://sketchplanations.com/variable-rewards
Spanish Data Protection Agency. (2024). Addictive patterns in processing of personal data. https://www.aepd.es/guides/addictive-patterns-in-processing-of-personal-data.pdf
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333(6043), 776-778. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207745
status.asucd.ucdavis.edu. (2024). Venture capital watch. https://status.asucd.ucdavis.edu/venture-capital-watch
Stirling, R. (2024). Ethics in VC: What should founders be able to expect? Medium. https://rorystirling.medium.com/ethics-in-vc-what-should-founders-be-able-to-expect-847af6c191d8
Storm, B. C., Hanczakowski, M., & Wiese, E. (2021). Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(9), 1477-1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211008060
TechDay. (2024). Why user well-being is key to trust and success in tech startups. https://techdayhq.com/blog/why-user-well-being-is-key-to-trust-and-success-in-tech-startups
The Collective. (2023). Building an ethical culture in tech organizations. https://www.jointhecollective.com/article/building-an-ethical-culture-in-tech-organizations/
The Corporate Governance Institute. (n.d.). How to build an ethical corporate culture. Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/insights/guides/how-to-build-an-ethical-corporate-culture/
The Regulatory Review. (2024, April 27). Detoxifying addictive tech. https://www.theregreview.org/2024/04/27/detoxifying-addictive-tech/
The Research Insights. (2025, June 11). 22.2% CAGR, digital health market size worth $946.04 billion growth, globally, by 2030. PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/22-2-cagr-digital-health-market-size-worth-946-04-billion-growth-globally-by-2030---exclusive-study-by-the-research-insights-302478960.html
United Nations Economist Network. (2023, February). Attention economy. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/attention_economy_feb.pdf
University of California, Davis (UC Davis) Health. (2024, May). Social media's impact on our mental health and tips to use it safely. https://health.ucdavis.edu/blog/cultivating-health/social-medias-impact-our-mental-health-and-tips-to-use-it-safely/2024/05
Van der Linden, S. (2023). The psychology of variable reward schedules. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-psychology-variable-reward-schedules
Virtual Addiction. (2024a). Technology addiction statistics 2025. https://virtual-addiction.com/technology-addiction-statistics-2025/
Ward, A. F. (2021). The internet has become the external hard drive for our memories. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-internet-has-become-the-external-hard-drive-for-our-memories/
Weland, C., Lindström, J., Vishkaei, B. M., & De Giovanni, P. (2023). Subscription-based business models in the context of tech firms: Theory and applications. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 6(5).
Wikipedia. (n.d.-a). Attention economy. In Wikipedia. Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_economy
Young Minds Network. (2023). How technology affects your child’s brain. https://youngmindsnetwork.com.au/how-technology-affects-your-childs-brain/
Comments
Post a Comment